Legislature(1999 - 2000)
1999-04-16 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1999-04-16 House Journal Page 0846 HJR 29 The following was read the second time: HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 29 Relating to the division of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. with the: Journal Page JUD RPT CS(JUD) 6DP 617 ZERO FISCAL NOTE (H.JUD) 617 Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original resolution: 1999-04-16 House Journal Page 0847 HJR 29 CS FOR HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 29(JUD) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHJR 29(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHJR 29(JUD) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHJR 29(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHJR 29(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 29 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 7 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Austerman, Berkowitz, Bunde, Cissna, Coghill, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Green, Grussendorf, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, James, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, Masek, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Williams Nays: Joule, Kapsner, Kookesh Excused: Barnes, Croft, Davies, Foster, Moses, Smalley, Whitaker Absent: Brice And so, CSHJR 29(JUD) passed the House and was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.